Get the Help and Supports!

This help center can answer your questions about customer services, products tech support, network issues.
Select a topic to get started.

ICT Tech Savings Week

2025 MEGA SALE | In-Stock & Budget-Friendly for Every Project

Shop Now

SFP-10G-SR vs LR vs DAC vs AOC: Selecting the Right 10G Connectivity for Your Enterprise

Selene Gong

Choosing the optimal 10 Gigabit Ethernet (10GbE) connectivity solution for your data center, campus network, or server interconnects requires balancing distance, performance, cost, power consumption, and deployment environment. The widely used SFP+ form factor supports four primary media types: SFP-10G-SR, SFP-10G-LR, DAC (Direct Attach Copper), and AOC (Active Optical Cable). This guide is aimed at network engineers, data center administrators, and IT procurement specialists who need actionable advice for deployment decisions, cost planning, and future upgrades.

Part 1: Overview and Key Differences

All four 10G solutions use the SFP+ interface for data transmission. Their primary differences lie in transmission medium, maximum distance, latency, and cost.

Comparison Table of 10G Connectivity Options:

Feature	SFP-10G-SR	SFP-10G-LR	DAC (Direct Attach Copper)	AOC (Active Optical Cable)
Medium	Multimode Fiber (MMF)	Single-Mode Fiber (SMF)	Twinax Copper	Multimode Fiber Cable
Max Distance	300–400m (OM3/OM4)	Up to 10km	5–10m	Up to 100m
Cost	Medium	High	Lowest	Medium
Power Consumption	~1W	~1W	<0.1W (passive)	1–2W
EMI Immunity	High	High	Low	High
Use Case	Intra-Building / Data Center	Campus Backbone / Metro	Intra-Rack (ToR/Server)	Inter-Rack (EoR/MoR)

Part 2: Optical Modules (SR vs LR)

SFP-10G-SR (Short Range)

- Wavelength: 850nm
- Distance: 300m (OM3) / 400m (OM4)
- Use Case: Ideal for short intra-building links, data center aggregation, or large enterprise closets.
- Vendor Notes: Cisco S-Class optics (e.g., SFP-10G-SR-S) are optimized for enterprise applications and cost-effective for 10G deployments.

SFP-10G-LR (Long Range)

- Wavelength: 1310nm
- Distance: Up to 10km over SMF
- Use Case: Connecting core switches across campuses or metropolitan networks.
- Extended Options: Modules like 10GBASE-ER or SFP-10G-ZR reach 40–80km, useful for large-scale campus or inter-site links.

Part 3: Cable Assemblies (DAC vs AOC)

DAC (Direct Attach Copper)

- Distance: Passive DAC 1–5m, Active DAC 7–10m
- Use Case: Intra-rack connections (server to Top-of-Rack switch), low-latency links
- Advantages: Lowest cost, near-zero power consumption, minimal latency
- Considerations: Copper is sensitive to EMI; suitable for clean, controlled data center environments.

AOC (Active Optical Cable)

- Distance: Up to 100m
- Use Case: Inter-rack connections, medium-sized data center floors (EoR/MoR)
- Advantages: Immune to EMI, longer reach than DAC, bundled solution reduces installation effort
- Considerations: Moderate cost, slightly higher power than DAC (~1W), requires optical conversion electronics

Part 4: Deployment Scenarios and Selection Guidance

- Under 10m / Intra-Rack: DAC is ideal — lowest cost, lowest power, lowest latency.
- 10–100m / Inter-Rack: AOC offers better performance, EMI immunity, and simplified cabling.
- <400m / Single Building (MMF): SFP-10G-SR modules are suitable.
- Up to 10km / Campus Backbone (SMF): SFP-10G-LR is recommended.

Tip: For mixed environments, verify switch port compatibility and check vendor-specific requirements. Many third-party SFP+ modules are fully compatible with Cisco, Juniper, and Arista equipment and often offer cost-effective alternatives. Use IT-Price for inventory and online quotation.

Part 5: Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) Considerations

1. Hardware Cost: DAC < AOC < SR/LR + fiber patch
2. Power Consumption: Passive DAC < AOC < Optical Transceivers
3. Installation & Maintenance: DAC and AOC simplify deployment; fiber transceivers require patch cables and connectors
4. Future Proofing: Higher-speed options exist (SFP28, QSFP+, QSFP28). Fiber solutions (SR/LR/AOC) scale better for 25G/40G/100G deployments.

Part 6: Compatibility Notes

- Cisco, Juniper, and Arista may enforce vendor key verification on SFP+ ports.
- Always validate third-party modules for proper coding to avoid port shutdowns.
- DAC and AOC share the SFP+ interface, but the host must support 10G SFP+ for operation.

Consider using Router-switch to verify compatibility and explore alternatives for unavailable or end-of-life modules.

Part 7: Frequently Asked Questions

What is the difference between SFP-10G-SR and LR?

SR uses MMF for short distances (<400m), while LR uses SMF for longer links (up to 10km). SR is ideal for intra-building; LR is best for cross-building or campus backbone links.

When should I use DAC or AOC cables?

DAC is optimal for short intra-rack connections with ultra-low latency. AOC is suitable for inter-rack connections up to 100m and for EMI-prone environments.

Which option offers the lowest latency?

DAC cables are preferred for high-performance switch-to-server interconnects due to minimal propagation delay.

How do I calculate TCO for SFP+ modules and cables?

TCO balances hardware cost, power consumption, and installation complexity. DAC offers the lowest cost and energy footprint for short links, while fiber modules plus patch cables (SR/LR) are better for medium-to-long distances and future upgrades.

How to plan for future 25G/40G/100G upgrades?

DAC distance decreases significantly at higher speeds. Fiber solutions (SR/LR/AOC) offer better scalability for longer links and higher-speed upgrades.

Part 8: Conclusion

Choosing the right 10G connectivity is about matching distance, performance, and cost with your network architecture. DAC is perfect for short, high-performance intra-rack links, AOC for inter-rack connections, SR for cross-closet links, and LR for campus backbones. Proper planning ensures reliable operation, minimized TCO, and scalability for future upgrades. Utilize Router-switch, IT-Price, BOM validation, and migration advisors to streamline procurement and deployment decisions naturally.