Express shipping to
Contacta con nosotras
Orden de pista
Search
Búsqueda popular
Consulta
Cesta
Entrar

Cupón
Presupuesto ahora,
ahorra hasta un 8%.

Consulta
Contacto

Comentario
Your Feedback
How would you Rate us?
Ease of use:
Buying feedback:
Product details:
  • Aspectos destacados
  • Design Guide
  • Recommended Product
  • Comparison
Fast Quote <24h

AI Fabric Highlights for Multi-GPU Clusters

Build low-latency Ethernet fabrics with Cisco, Aruba, Juniper, and Huawei switches plus 10/25/40/100/400G optics and DAC/AOC for scalable AI GPU clusters.

High-Bandwidth Fabrics

25/40/100/400G spine-leaf ports keep GPU training saturated at scale.

Deterministic Low Latency

Cisco, Aruba, Juniper, Huawei switches deliver predictable microsecond latency.

End-to-End AI Interconnects

QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics and dense DAC/AOC simplify high-density GPU cabling.

Designing Scalable Networks for AI GPU Clusters

Explore how to design scalable, low-latency network fabrics that connect single GPU nodes into high-density AI clusters, covering spine-leaf architectures, bandwidth planning, and interconnect best practices for training and inference workloads.

Designing

  • Key Challenges in Networking for AI GPU Scaling

    AI training and inference clusters push networks to their limits with east-west traffic, microburst behavior, and strict latency and jitter tolerances. Traditional three-tier designs often become bottlenecks when scaling from single GPU servers to multi-rack clusters, leading to oversubscription, unpredictable job completion times, and complex cabling. Understanding traffic patterns, required bisection bandwidth, and failure domains is essential before choosing a fabric model or optics strategy, especially for environments targeting rapid scale-out and mixed AI and HPC workloads.

    Discuss Your Challenges
Designing

  • Spine-Leaf Fabrics and High-Speed Interconnect Design

    Once these challenges are identified, a non-blocking or low-oversubscription spine-leaf fabric becomes the foundation for predictable AI performance. Leaf switches provide TOR connectivity for GPU servers, while spine switches deliver equal-cost multipath forwarding across pods. Careful selection of 10/25/40/100/400G optics, DAC, and AOC cabling allows consistent latency, simplified topology, and clean migration paths as GPU density and link speeds increase. Designing around modular pods, standard link templates, and clear growth increments enables teams to scale horizontally without redesigning the entire network.

    Plan Your Fabric Design
Designing

  • Operational Best Practices for AI Cluster Connectivity

    Building on the above, operations and lifecycle strategy are critical to keep AI clusters reliable at scale. Standardizing on a small set of transceiver and cable types simplifies spares and troubleshooting. Consistent QoS, congestion management, and monitoring policies across spine, leaf, and aggregation layers help maintain low latency even under heavy jobs. Documented pod designs, automated provisioning, and clear upgrade paths from 25G to 100/400G enable teams to expand GPU capacity with minimal disruption while preserving network performance and application SLAs.

    Get Deployment Advice

Spine-Leaf Fabrics vs Three-Tier Networks for AI

Spine-leaf Ethernet fabrics deliver lower latency, higher bandwidth, and simpler scaling for AI GPU clusters than legacy three-tier enterprise data center networks.

AspectTraditional Three-Tier Network
Spine-Leaf Ethernet Fabric for AI
Outcome for You
Latency and HopsTraffic traverses access, aggregation, and core layers, adding hops and jitter for east-west AI flows.Any-to-any GPU traffic crosses a predictable 1–2 hops with consistent, ultra-low latency.Faster AI training convergence and more stable inference performance for latency-sensitive models.
East-West vs North-South TrafficOptimized for north-south client–server traffic, not dense east-west GPU-to-GPU communication.Architected for massive east-west bandwidth between GPU nodes and AI pods.Higher GPU utilization and fewer bottlenecks when scaling distributed training jobs.
Scalability and ExpansionScaling requires re-architecting aggregation/core, often hitting chassis and oversubscription limits.Scale out linearly by adding more leaf and spine switches with predictable performance.Grow from single-node pilots to large multi-GPU clusters without redesigning the fabric.
Bandwidth and OversubscriptionHigh oversubscription between layers; 10/40G uplinks can choke 25/100/400G GPU servers.High-bandwidth 25/100/400G links with carefully planned oversubscription or non-blocking designs.Assured throughput for GPU east-west traffic and faster completion of large training runs.
Cabling and Topology ComplexityMulti-layer hierarchy, diverse link speeds, and complex paths make cabling and troubleshooting harder.Uniform leaf-to-spine connectivity using high-density DAC/AOC and optics simplifies design.Faster deployment, easier operations, and reduced risk of cabling errors in GPU racks and pods.
AI Fabric Optimization FeaturesLimited support for RoCE tuning, ECN, PFC, and congestion management across all tiers.Designed for lossless or near-lossless Ethernet with RoCE, ECN, PFC, and QoS for AI workloads.More deterministic performance for distributed training, checkpointing, and large dataset movement.
Future-Readiness for 100/400GLegacy chassis and line cards may not support dense 100/400G ports or modern QSFP-DD optics.Built around 25/100/400G-ready switches and standardized QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics and cables.Protects investments and simplifies migration to next-gen GPU platforms and faster AI fabrics.

Need Help? Technical Experts Available Now.

  • +1-626-655-0998 (USA)
    UTC 15:00-00:00
  • +852-2592-5389 (HK)
    UTC 00:00-09:00
  • +852-2592-5411 (HK)
    UTC 06:00-15:00
Get a Quote
Live Chat
Need Help? Technical Experts Available Now.

AI Networking Use Cases for GPU Clusters

Discover where Cisco, HPE Aruba, Juniper, and Huawei data center fabrics, routers, optics, and DAC/AOC interconnects best fit when scaling AI from single GPU nodes to large multi-GPU clusters.

AI Training Clusters

AI Training Clusters

  • Build high-throughput GPU training fabrics for LLMs, vision models, and recommendation engines. Cisco Nexus, Aruba CX, Juniper QFX, and Huawei CloudEngine spine-leaf switches with 100/400G links, QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics, and low-latency DAC/AOC cables keep gradients flowing and GPUs fully utilized.
Real-Time Inference

Real-Time Inference

  • Power latency-sensitive AI services such as fraud detection, recommendation, and conversational bots. Top-of-rack switches and edge routers use 25/100G links and high-density DAC/AOC connections to deliver microsecond-level response, predictable QoS, and reliable east-west and north-south traffic handling.
HPC & Simulation

HPC & Simulation

  • Support CFD, risk analytics, genomic pipelines, and scientific workloads with deterministic bandwidth and scale-out performance. Spine-leaf architectures with 40/100/400G switching, routed fabrics, and optical transceivers provide the non-blocking throughput required for tightly coupled HPC and GPU-accelerated simulation jobs.
AI Data Pipelines

AI Data Pipelines

  • Optimize data ingest, feature extraction, and model serving between storage, CPUs, and GPUs. High-bandwidth TOR and aggregation switches, combined with 10/25/100G optics and DAC links, eliminate bottlenecks between data lakes, object storage, and GPU nodes in modern AI and MLOps pipelines.
Multi-Site AI Fabrics

Multi-Site AI Fabrics

  • Interconnect GPU pods and clusters across data centers or regions. Cisco ASR, MX, and Huawei NE aggregation routers, paired with 100/400G optical transceivers, deliver resilient, high-capacity DCI for distributed training, model replication, and hybrid cloud AI deployments managed by enterprises and MSPs.

Preguntas frecuentes

How do I choose the right spine-leaf switches and routers to scale from a single GPU server to a multi-GPU AI cluster?

Start from your target AI workload and growth plan. For training-heavy clusters, prioritize low-latency, non-blocking Ethernet fabrics using Cisco Nexus/Catalyst 9000, HPE Aruba CX, Juniper QFX, or Huawei CloudEngine as spine-leaf switches, and plan 25/100/400G ports for east–west traffic between GPU nodes. For north–south and inter–data center connectivity, size Cisco ASR, Juniper MX, or Huawei NE routers based on aggregate throughput, required routing features (MPLS, EVPN, Segment Routing), and resiliency. Our team can help you right-size the fabric so you can start with a few servers and scale to full GPU racks and pods without forklift upgrades.

What network speeds and optics do I need for AI GPU clusters (25G/40G/100G/400G, QSFP28, QSFP-DD, DAC, AOC)?

  • For access/TOR to GPU nodes: 25G or 100G server-facing ports are common today, often using DAC cables for short-reach in-rack connections and AOC for slightly longer runs while keeping latency low and cabling simple.
  • For spine-leaf uplinks and aggregation: 100G and 400G QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics are recommended for AI training fabrics, with LR/DR/FR modules for longer distances and high-density DAC/AOC for short-reach, high-bandwidth links within pods and rows.

Can I mix brands (Cisco, HPE Aruba, Juniper, Huawei) and third-party transceivers in my AI network without losing performance or compatibility?

Yes, multi-vendor AI networks are common, but they must be planned carefully. Many spine-leaf fabrics use Cisco Nexus or Juniper QFX in the core while leveraging HPE Aruba CX or Huawei CloudEngine at the access/TOR layer, with standards-based Ethernet (25/40/100/400G) providing interoperability. When using third-party or non-OEM optics (QSFP28/QSFP-DD) and DAC/AOC cables, it is critical to ensure coding compatibility, supported features, and firmware alignment to avoid link flaps or de-rated speeds.
    Key compatibility considerations
  • Validate transceiver and DAC/AOC coding against the specific switch or router model and software version (e.g., Cisco NX-OS, Junos, ArubaOS-CX, Huawei VRP) to ensure the ports come up at the intended speed without errors.
  • Check support for advanced features such as forward error correction (FEC), breakout modes (4x25G, 4x100G), and DOM monitoring to maintain predictable throughput and low latency in AI training clusters.
    How router-switch.com helps
  • We provide pre-tested combinations of Cisco, HPE Aruba, Juniper, and Huawei switches and routers with matching QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics and DAC/AOC cables, reducing the risk of interoperability issues in your AI GPU fabric.
  • Our solution consultants can review your existing environment and recommend a validated, multi-vendor bill of materials (BOM) that balances performance, cost, and future scalability for AI and HPC workloads.

How do spine-leaf Ethernet fabrics compare to traditional three-tier networks for AI GPU clusters?

For AI training and large-scale inference, spine-leaf architectures deliver predictable low latency, equal-cost multi-path (ECMP) routing, and non-blocking east–west bandwidth across GPU nodes—capabilities that traditional core–aggregation–access designs struggle to match. Spine-leaf fabrics using Cisco Nexus, Aruba CX, Juniper QFX/EX, or Huawei CloudEngine enable consistent hop counts and higher bisectional bandwidth, which are critical for distributed training jobs, parameter synchronization, and data-intensive HPC workloads. This results in faster model convergence, better GPU utilization, and more efficient scaling from a single node to multi-GPU clusters.

What about warranty, technical support, and lifecycle for these AI networking products?

  • Cisco, HPE Aruba, Juniper, and Huawei each provide different hardware warranty, software subscription, and vendor support options (e.g., SmartNet, Foundation Care, Service Contracts), and these can vary greatly by product family, license level, and region.
  • router-switch.com helps you choose switches, routers, optics, and DAC/AOC cables that align with your AI roadmap and lifecycle strategy, including EOS/EOL planning and migration paths for bandwidth upgrades (25G to 100G to 400G). Please note: Specific warranty terms and support services may vary by product and region. For accurate details, please refer to the official information. For further inquiries, please contact: router-switch.com.

How can router-switch.com help design and optimize my AI network from proof of concept to full production?

router-switch.com provides end-to-end guidance for AI networking, from sizing an initial single-node or small GPU cluster to architecting multi-rack, multi-GPU fabrics with 25/100/400G Ethernet. We help you select the right mix of Cisco Nexus/Catalyst 9000, HPE Aruba CX, Juniper QFX/EX, and Huawei CloudEngine switches, plus ASR, MX, and NE routers for aggregation and inter–data center traffic. Our curated ecosystem of QSFP28/QSFP-DD optics and high-density DAC/AOC cables is optimized for low latency, consistent throughput, and clean cabling in GPU racks and pods, ensuring your AI training and inference workloads scale predictably and cost-effectively.

Featured Reviews

Ethan Chambers

We needed to scale from a few GPU nodes to a full AI training cluster without compromising latency. Router-switch.com helped us design a Cisco and Juniper spine-leaf fabric with the right 100/400G optics and DACs. The performance is rock solid, delivery was fast, and their pre-sales guidance saved us weeks of trial and error.

Amira El Masri

Our AI team struggled to balance throughput, budget, and multivendor support. Router-switch.com delivered a hybrid Aruba CX and Cisco Nexus solution with matching 100G/400G transceivers that just worked. They validated compatibility, optimized BOM costs, and provided excellent post-sales follow-up across multiple regions.

Takumi Sato

We required a low-latency fabric for GPU training plus reliable DCI for our AI workloads. Router-switch.com proposed Huawei CloudEngine and Juniper MX with a full set of QSFP optics and DAC/AOC cables. Deployment was smooth, documentation clear, and the pricing and lead times beat our previous vendors by a wide margin.

Más soluciones

Ethernet vs InfiniBand for AI & HPC Networks

Ethernet vs InfiniBand for AI & HPC Networks

A focused comparison of Ethernet and InfiniBand for AI/HPC fabrics—latency, scaling, RDMA, and cost trade-offs.

AI & HPC Networking
Copper vs Fiber vs DAC/AOC Interconnects Guide

Copper vs Fiber vs DAC/AOC Interconnects Guide

A complete comparison of copper, fiber, DAC, and AOC—latency, reach, cost, and 10G/25G/100G/400G deployment suitability.

Cabling & Transceivers
Beyond Bandwidth: The 100G+ Data Center Architecture (en inglés)

Beyond Bandwidth: The 100G+ Data Center Architecture (en inglés)

La imprescindible fundación 100G - crecimiento listo para ia, rendimiento de latcero

Centro de datos
Acceso
Registro