Express shipping to
Search
Pesquisa popular
Investigação
Carrinho de compras
Iniciar Sessão

Cupão
Cote agora,
economize até 8%.

Investigação
Contato

Opinião
Your Feedback
How would you Rate us?
Ease of use:
Buying feedback:
Product details:
  • Introdução
  • Design Guide
  • Recommended Product
  • Comparison
  • Uses Cases
Fast Quote <24h

What Is GPU Cluster Networking Architecture?

What

  • GPU cluster networking architecture is the high‑bandwidth, low‑latency fabric that interconnects GPU servers, storage, and services for AI training, inference, and HPC workloads. Built on 25G/100G/400G Cisco Nexus/Catalyst 9000 and Juniper QFX/EX data center switches, it uses non‑blocking spine–leaf designs to keep GPU pipelines fully utilized and minimize communication bottlenecks during large‑scale distributed jobs.

    Key capabilities include EVPN‑VXLAN for scalable layer‑2/3 fabrics, RoCE‑optimized underlay with QoS and PFC, and high‑density 40G/100G/400G optical transceivers plus QSFP+/QSFP28/QSFP‑DD DAC/AOC cabling. This combination delivers deterministic latency, predictable throughput, and flexible scale‑out, enabling architects and engineers to design GPU clusters that accelerate model training, shorten time‑to‑results, and support elastic AI/HPC data center expansion.

Designing Ethernet Fabrics for GPU Clusters

Explore how to design high‑bandwidth, low‑latency Ethernet fabrics for GPU clusters, from leaf–spine architecture and RoCE underlays to optics and cabling choices for scalable AI and HPC workloads.

Designing

  • GPU Fabric Requirements for AI and HPC Workloads

    Modern GPU clusters driving AI training, inference, and HPC workloads demand non‑blocking bandwidth, microsecond‑level latency, and predictable congestion behavior. Architects must account for east‑west traffic patterns, large‑scale all‑to‑all exchanges, and RoCE‑based transport. This section clarifies target metrics for oversubscription, ECN and PFC behavior, failure domains, and expansion headroom so you can translate application SLAs into concrete Ethernet fabric requirements before selecting switches, optics, and cabling.

    Discuss Your Requirements
Designing

  • Leaf–Spine, EVPN‑VXLAN, and RoCE‑Ready Underlay Design

    Once fabric requirements are defined, the next step is selecting an appropriate topology and control plane. A leaf–spine architecture with EVPN‑VXLAN provides scalable layer‑2/3 connectivity and tenant isolation, while a carefully tuned underlay enables loss‑sensitive RoCE traffic. Here we outline best‑practice design patterns for 25G/100G/400G ports, ECMP, MTU, QoS, and buffer planning so your Ethernet fabric delivers deterministic performance for GPU job scheduling and multi‑tenant clusters.

    Get Fabric Design Guidance

GPU Fabric Switch & Optics Highlights

Cisco and Juniper 25G/100G/400G Ethernet spine–leaf switches, optics, and cabling for low-latency, non-blocking AI and HPC GPU clusters.

Scalable 100G/400G Fabric

Build non-blocking leaf–spine with 25G to 400G ports and up to 12.8T throughput.

GPU-Optimized Ethernet

RoCE-ready underlay with ECN, PFC, and telemetry tuned for AI training fabric losslessness.

EVPN-VXLAN Automation

Standards-based EVPN-VXLAN for multi-tenant AI clusters and seamless GPU fabric scaling.

Ethernet GPU Fabrics vs InfiniBand: AI & HPC Comparison

Compare InfiniBand with modern 100G/400G Ethernet GPU fabrics to balance latency, scalability, and cost for AI and HPC clusters.

AspectTraditional InfiniBand Fabrics
Ethernet GPU Cluster Fabric (100G/400G)
Outcome for You
Latency & JitterUltra‑low latency, tightly controlled but on a proprietary stack.Near–InfiniBand latency with RoCE‑optimized 100G/400G Cisco/Juniper Ethernet.Predictable GPU job completion times without locking into a single fabric vendor.
Throughput & Port SpeedsHigh bandwidth but limited ecosystem for 400G and future upgrades.Rich 25G/100G/400G roadmap using standard QSFP optics and DAC/AOC cabling.Scale AI training bandwidth using widely available, cost‑efficient 400G switches and optics.
Scalability & Fabric DesignScales well, but large Clos fabrics are complex and tightly coupled to one vendor.Leaf–spine EVPN‑VXLAN fabrics scale horizontally across pods and domains.Add GPU racks and spines incrementally without redesigning the whole interconnect.
Ecosystem & OpennessProprietary tooling and limited integration with mainstream DC networks.Standards‑based Ethernet interoperating with existing Cisco Nexus, Catalyst, and Juniper QFX/EX.Unify AI, storage, and enterprise traffic on one fabric, simplifying operations and skills reuse.
Operational Tools & SkillsSpecialized management; fewer engineers with deep InfiniBand experience.Leverages familiar DC ops, telemetry, and automation frameworks for Ethernet.Faster deployment and troubleshooting using tools your team already knows.
TCO & ProcurementHigher cost per port, limited sourcing, and lock‑in to one primary vendor.Competitive pricing for switches, optics, and cables from multiple Ethernet vendors.Reduce capex and supply‑chain risk while keeping GPU clusters performant.
Workload Fit (AI & HPC)Excellent for tightly coupled MPI and niche ultra‑latency‑sensitive workloads.Optimized for large‑scale AI training, inference, and mixed HPC on shared fabrics.Support today’s GPU training needs and future multi‑tenant AI services on one architecture.

Need Help? Technical Experts Available Now.

  • +1-626-655-0998 (USA)
    UTC 15:00-00:00
  • +852-2592-5389 (HK)
    UTC 00:00-09:00
  • +852-2592-5411 (HK)
    UTC 06:00-15:00
Get a Quote
Live Chat
Need Help? Technical Experts Available Now.

GPU Cluster Networking Use Cases

Discover where Cisco and Juniper 25G/100G/400G switches, optics, and cabling enable low‑latency, scalable GPU clusters for AI, ML, and HPC workloads.

AI Training Fabrics

AI Training Fabrics

  • Design non‑blocking GPU clusters for large‑scale model training using Cisco Nexus/Catalyst 9000 and Juniper QFX/EX in EVPN‑VXLAN spine–leaf fabrics. High‑density 100G/400G ports, RoCE‑optimized underlays, and lossless congestion control ensure deterministic job completion and efficient GPU utilization at hyperscale.
Real-Time Inference

Real-Time Inference

  • Support latency‑critical inference services for fintech, ad tech, and personalization platforms with 25G ToR and 100G/400G aggregation. Cisco and Juniper data center switches with precise QoS, PFC, and ECN deliver microsecond‑level latency, consistent throughput, and predictable performance across GPU nodes and front‑end application tiers.
HPC Simulations

HPC Simulations

  • Build high‑throughput interconnects for CFD, seismic processing, genomics, and engineering workloads. 100G/400G spine–leaf designs with QSFP+/QSFP28/QSFP‑DD optics and DAC/AOC cabling provide dense east‑west bandwidth, enabling MPI and GPU‑accelerated HPC jobs to run efficiently across large clusters with predictable scaling and minimal network contention.
Enterprise AI Clouds

Enterprise AI Clouds

  • Deliver private AI and MLOps platforms for large enterprises using Cisco and Juniper 25G/100G/400G switching. EVPN‑VXLAN fabrics connect GPU pools, storage, and tenant networks with strong segmentation, automation, and visibility, enabling secure multi‑tenant AI services and predictable performance for diverse training and inference pipelines.

perguntas frequentes

How do I choose between Cisco and Juniper switches for my GPU cluster networking architecture?

Both Cisco (Nexus, Catalyst 9000) and Juniper (QFX, EX) deliver low‑latency, high‑throughput Ethernet fabrics for AI/ML and HPC. The right choice usually depends on your existing data center standard, preferred NOS (NX‑OS, IOS‑XE, Junos), automation stack (Ansible, Terraform, Python), and operational expertise. From a GPU cluster networking perspective, focus on consistent 100G/400G port density, RoCE‑ready buffer architecture, EVPN‑VXLAN support, and non‑blocking spine–leaf designs. Router-switch.com can help you compare concrete models, optics, and cabling options to align with your performance and budget targets.

What network bandwidth and topology do I need for AI training GPUs – 25G/100G/400G and spine–leaf?

  • Most modern GPU training clusters use 100G per GPU server uplink to the ToR switch and 100G/400G uplinks from ToR to spine to build a non‑blocking or low‑oversubscription leaf–spine fabric for east‑west AI traffic.
  • For large‑scale AI/ML and HPC environments, 400G spine switches with 4×100G or 8×50G breakout options provide higher bisectional bandwidth, better scaling, and more deterministic performance for RoCE‑based GPU communications in EVPN‑VXLAN fabrics.

Which optics, DAC, and AOC cables should I use between GPU servers, ToR, and spine switches?

For short‑reach GPU server to ToR connectivity inside the rack, passive DAC (QSFP+/QSFP28/QSFP‑DD) is typically preferred for 40G/100G/400G because of its low latency, low power, and lower cost. For inter‑rack or row‑to‑row connections between ToR and spine switches, customers usually combine active DAC/AOC for medium distances and 40G/100G/400G optical transceivers with multimode or single‑mode fiber for longer runs, depending on data center layout and future capacity plans.
    Recommended cabling choices for GPU clusters
  • In‑rack: 25G/100G DAC or AOC from GPU NICs to ToR ports for minimal latency and simplified management.
  • End‑of‑row / aggregation: 100G/400G AOC or optical transceivers (e.g., QSFP28 SR4/DR, QSFP‑DD DR4/FR4) for scalable spine–leaf interconnects.
    Compatibility and interoperability considerations
  • Match transceiver form factor and coding (QSFP+/QSFP28/QSFP‑DD) to each Cisco Nexus/Catalyst or Juniper QFX/EX port, and ensure the optics are coded or tested for that vendor to avoid link or support issues.
  • When mixing vendors in the same fabric, validate link‑level interoperability (FEC mode, autonegotiation, breakout mappings) in a lab or PoC before rolling out to production GPU nodes.

Can Ethernet with EVPN‑VXLAN and RoCE really replace InfiniBand for AI and HPC GPU clusters?

Modern 100G/400G data center Ethernet fabrics using Cisco Nexus/Catalyst 9000 or Juniper QFX with EVPN‑VXLAN and a well‑tuned RoCE (RDMA over Converged Ethernet) underlay can achieve microsecond‑level latency and high throughput that is competitive with many InfiniBand deployments. For many AI training, inference, and mixed HPC workloads, this converged Ethernet approach simplifies operations, reduces cost, and offers better interoperability with existing IP networks while still delivering deterministic performance for GPU clusters.

How scalable is this Cisco and Juniper based GPU cluster networking architecture, and can I expand from 100G to 400G later?

The proposed GPU cluster architecture is built around spine–leaf fabrics using modular or fixed 100G/400G switches that support port‑by‑port configuration, breakouts, and flexible optics. You can start with 25G/100G server access to the ToR and 100G uplinks to the spine, then introduce 400G spine switches or spine line cards and migrate critical trunks to 400G as cluster size and training jobs grow. Using EVPN‑VXLAN and standardized optics/DAC/AOC cabling protects your initial investment while enabling linear scale‑out of GPU servers, storage, and fabric capacity.

What about warranty, support, and lifecycle when purchasing Cisco or Juniper switches and optics for GPU fabrics?

When designing a GPU fabric with Cisco Nexus/Catalyst and Juniper QFX/EX, it is important to align hardware and optics choices with the vendors’ official lifecycle policies, software roadmaps, and available support contracts, especially for mission‑critical AI training and HPC clusters. Many customers combine vendor support with value‑added services from partners like router-switch.com for design validation, BOM optimization, and migration planning. Please note: Specific warranty terms and support services may vary by product and region. For accurate details, please refer to the official information. For further inquiries, please contact: router-switch.com.

Featured Reviews

David Henderson

We needed a deterministic low-latency fabric for GPU training without blowing up our capex. Router-switch.com delivered a Cisco–Juniper mix of 100G/400G switches, optics, and DACs that dropped straight into our EVPN-VXLAN design. Their pricing, stock reliability, and design guidance helped us scale faster while keeping interoperability risks low.

Aiko Tanaka

Our AI team needed predictable RoCE performance and a clear migration path from 100G to 400G. Router-switch.com proposed a QFX-based spine–leaf with matching Cisco and Juniper optics that just works. Orders arrived quickly, fully compatible, and their presales engineers helped fine-tune buffer and QoS settings for stable GPU workloads.

Markus Vogel

Designing a new GPU cluster, we struggled to balance throughput, latency, and long-term scalability. Router-switch.com supplied Nexus and QFX switches with 100G/400G optics and DACs as a validated bundle. The fabric is non-blocking, RoCE-ready, and their post-sales support on optics compatibility and RMA handling has been outstanding.

Mais soluções

Ethernet vs InfiniBand for AI & HPC Networks

Ethernet vs InfiniBand for AI & HPC Networks

A focused comparison of Ethernet and InfiniBand for AI/HPC fabrics—latency, scaling, RDMA, and cost trade-offs.

AI & HPC Networking
Para além da largura de banda: a arquitetura de data center 100G+

Para além da largura de banda: a arquitetura de data center 100G+

A base 100G essencial - crescimento pronto para IA, desempenho com latência zero

Centro de dados
Copper vs Fiber vs DAC/AOC Interconnects Guide

Copper vs Fiber vs DAC/AOC Interconnects Guide

A complete comparison of copper, fiber, DAC, and AOC—latency, reach, cost, and 10G/25G/100G/400G deployment suitability.

Cabling & Transceivers
Conecte-se
Registro